Home Background Supplier Information Data Room Calendar Contact Us Online Proposal Website

Click here for the Online Proposal Website

Contact Us

FAQ Archives - DSP IV – March 2019 Solicitation

The FAQs on this page are no longer relevant, as they are from past solicitations.  These FAQs are posted here only for reference purposes.  Do not rely on the information provided on this page for the current solicitation.

• FAQ-74:
  When is the Commission expected to make a decision on the March 2019 Solicitation? What is the deadline for winning bidders to execute transaction confirmations?
  
  On the day that the Commission approves some or all of the winning Bids (by Thursday, March 14, 2019), the Independent Evaluator notifies all RFP Bidders that have approved Bids. PECO sends winning bidders partially executed Uniform SMAs and Transaction Confirmation(s) by overnight delivery service by close of business on the second business day following the Commission approval (Monday, March 18, 2019). The fully executed Uniform SMA and Transaction Confirmation(s) are due by 2PM on the third business day following Commission approval (Tuesday, March 19, 2019). Please see additional information on the post-bid process in Section VII.3 of the RFP Rules.
  
  03/14/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-73:
  When completing the Bid Form, if we do not want to submit a Bid for a tranche, do we leave the space provided blank or enter $0? For example, if an RFP Bidder would like to submit Bids on 7 of the 12 available tranches on its Bid Form for the RES-12-Jun19 product, do we enter prices in the spaces labeled 1-7 and leave the spaces labeled 8-12 blank?
  
  When completing your Bid Form, Bids should be entered from top to bottom in Section 2 in the “Bids” tab of the Bid Form. Tranches for which no Bid is provided must be left blank. Specifically, in regards to your example, if an RFP Bidder would like to submit bids on 7 of the 12 available tranches on its Bid Form for the RES-12-Jun19 product, such RFP Bidder, in the column designated for the RES-12-Jun19 product (column C), should enter a Bid in each of the spaces labeled 1-7 and leave the spaces labeled 8-12 blank. (Depending on load caps, not all RFP Bidders will be able to bid on all available tranches.) For additional information please see “STEP 1 – Completion of the Bid Form” in the Bid Form Guide provided with your Part 1 Notification on February 28, 2019.

  Please note that each price on the Bid Form is for a single tranche. A “Bid” is a price in $/MWh for one tranche of a given product.
  
  03/11/2019 in Rules
  
  

• FAQ-72:
  What settlement volume are Default Suppliers get paid on?
  
  Default Suppliers are responsible for and are paid based on a percentage of the Default Load for a Class. The applicable settlement volume includes distribution losses, transmission losses, unaccounted for energy (as reflected in PJM settlement volumes), and adjustments required by PJM for PJM’s derating in conjunction with implementation of marginal losses as appropriate per PJM Agreements.

  The hourly load data provided in the Data Room includes both applicable distribution and transmission losses, and has not been de-rated. PJM hourly de-ration factors and the hourly UFE values are available separately on the Data Room page on the RFP website. Please also see the Data Description Document, for information regarding how PECO allocates Unaccounted For Energy (“UFE”) to all Load Serving Entities (“LSEs”) in PECO’s zone.
  
  03/11/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-71:
  Can you please provide line loss data?
  
  The loss percentages for each customer class is available in PECO’s Current Electric Generation Supplier Tariff (see 6.6 Line Losses on page 30) available here: https://www.peco.com/MyAccount/MyBillUsage/Pages/CurrentElectric.asp
  
  03/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-70:
  Where can we confirm whether Buyer or Seller is the responsible party for Network Integration Transmission Service (ID #1100)?
  
  The Uniform SMA was developed under PECO’s third Default Service Program through the uniform procurement process across the EDCs in Pennsylvania, as envisioned by the Commission. While the SMA is uniform, EDC-specific provisions are included. Please see Appendix D to the Uniform SMA, which provides the PJM Billing Statement line items, including transmission charges, and the responsible party (Buyer or Seller) for each item. PECO is the responsible party for Network Integration Transmission Service (ID #1100).
  
  03/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-69:
  What information is available regarding PECO’s new street lighting rate schedule that will be introduced in June 2019?
  
  PECO will introduce a new street lighting rate schedule (SL-C ) for the Small Commercial Class in June 2019. This rate schedule is for customers who install a Smart Lighting Control Module for their street lights, which will provide the customer with more control over the light’s burning hours. For example, the module may produce data showing when lamps are on or off, and/or provide options to dim lights at different percentages. Historical data for this new rate schedule is not available at this time.
  
  03/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-68:
  Are Default Suppliers responsible for the AEPS Quarterly Adjustments?
  
  As fully described in Appendix E to the Uniform SMA, PECO provides Default Suppliers with an estimate of AEPS obligations following the second quarter of the AEPS reporting period with a final statement within thirty (30) calendar days of the end of the AEPS reporting period. Data on AEPS Quarterly Adjustments is available on the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Credit Program website here: http://www.pennaeps.com/electricity-suppliers/

  As stated in Appendix E, “If AEPS requirements change by law or any other reason, DS Supplier shall be responsible for providing the credits at its expense in order to comply with its obligations under Full Requirements Service.” A Default Supplier that fails to provide sufficient AECs for a tranche will be required to pay any AEPS penalties, costs, charges, etc. assessed against the Default Supplier and/or the Company associated with the Default Supplier’s non-performance with AEPS requirements.
  
  03/08/2019 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-67:
  Can you confirm that the hourly load data, and daily PLC and NSPL data in the Data Room has not already been adjusted for the NYPA allocation?
  
  The daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data for the Residential class are not adjusted for the NYPA allocation. Hourly load data for the Residential Class, which is broken down by load related to PECO’s default service customers (“Default Energy”) and load related to customers who have elected to be supplied by an Electric Generation Supplier (“EGS Energy”), is handled differently. In regards to the hourly load data for the Residential class, PECO subtracts the NYPA allocation from the Default Energy (MWh) column and adds a corresponding amount to the EGS Energy (MWh) column. The data description document has been revised and the updated version is posted to the Monthly data page in the Data Room.

  As a reminder, PECO assumes responsibility of approximately 1% of the Default Load of the Residential Class and the data in the Data Room has not be adjusted for this amount.
  
  03/07/2019 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-66:
  We saw a news article regarding adding nuclear to the state’s Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (“AEPS”). Would this change be the responsibility of Default Suppliers?
  
  We do not comment on news articles. The adoption of the draft legislation referenced in the question is speculative. Neither PECO nor the Independent Evaluator can speculate on the implications of such draft legislation on Default Suppliers.
  
  03/01/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-65:
  What Daily Zonal Scaling Factors should be applied to the PLC data in Table I-2 of the RFP Rules?
  
  The Total Peak (MW) and Default Peak (MW) for each Class is provided in Table I-2 of the RFP Rules. This data was updated as of January 2019 for delivery year 2019/20. A forecast of daily PLC data and daily zonal scaling factors for the delivery year 2019/20 is not available.
  
  03/01/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-64:
  An RFP Bidder that is relying on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor and is not a Default Supplier must provide a complete Guaranty Intent Insert (#P2-2) with the Part 2 Proposal. How do I calculate the Indicative Amount?
  
  The Indicative Amount must meet or exceed the sum of: (i) $600,000 times the number of tranches bid on products for the RES and SC Classes for full requirements on a fixed-price basis; and (ii) $300,000 times the number of tranches bid for the CCI Class for full requirements service on a spot-price basis (if applicable). Please see Section V.3.2 of the RFP Rules for additional information.
  
  03/01/2019 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-63:
  There is a typographical error on slide 24 of the Bidder Information Webcast regarding the time period of the RES 24-month product. Can you please correct this?
  
  Thank you for bringing this to our attention. A revised Bidder Information Webcast, dated February 28, 2019, has been posted to the Supplier Information – Documents page of the RFP website. The only change was to correct the start of the supply period for the RES-24-Jun19 product on slide 24.
  
  03/01/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-62:
  Where can I find my login information to participate in the March 4 bidder training session?
  
  The confidential login information to access the secure file transfer system during Bid Submission Training on March 4, 2019 was provided to qualified RFP Bidders with the Part 1 Notification on February 28, 2019. The file is named “2a Confidential Information Bidder Training”. The Part 1 Notification is sent to the Representative and any Nominee(s).
  
  03/01/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-61:
  Does PECO plan to have ARR credits to transfer to winning bidders of the March 2019 solicitation for the 2019/20 planning year? Will Bidders be provided the list of the paths and the MW quantity associated with each?
  
  PECO will be participating in Stage 1A of the 2019 Annual ARR Allocation and will have ARR credits to transfer to winning bidders for the products available in the March 2019 Solicitation. PECO will provide to RFP Bidders the results of Stage 1A including the paths and the amount of MWs awarded along with an allocation estimate for each Class on Friday, March 8, 2019.
  
  03/01/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-60:
  Is it acceptable for the Issuer extend the number of days to satisfy a drawing request in Paragraph 6 of the Post-Bid Letter of Credit (Appendix F)?
  
  An RFP Bidder may request modifications to the Post-Bid Letter of Credit that are non-material in nature, or that are advantageous to both PECO and the RFP Bidder with its Part 1 Proposal. Extending the number of days for the Issuer to satisfy a drawing request to three business days in Paragraph 6 would not be an acceptable modification.
  
  02/27/2019 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-59:
  What is the NYPA allocation for the 2019/2020 Planning Year?
  
  The NYPA allocation for the 2019/20 planning year will not be available until after the March 2019 Solicitation. The annual allocation is based on the number of residential customers PECO serves. PECO does not provide forecasts of its number of residential customers, thus PECO cannot speculate on how this allocation would change in the future.
  
  02/25/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-58:
  Should an RFP Bidder account for the NYPA allocation by reducing both energy and capacity by 8.5MW? Are Default Suppliers responsible for providing any of the services or products included in full requirements service for the fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”)?
  
  Default Load for the Residential Class is reduced by a fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”). The 8.5 MW refers to cleared capacity in the PJM RPM Auction, and it is not a flat MWh amount.

  Default Suppliers are not responsible for providing any of the services or products included in full requirements service for NYPA supply.
  
  02/25/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-57:
  Can you please provide the Peak Load Contribution (PLC) by class for planning year 19/20?
  
  A forecast of daily PLC data for the delivery year 2019/20 is not available. The Total Peak (MW) and Default Peak (MW) for each Class is provided in Table I-2 of the RFP Rules. This data was updated as of January 2019 for delivery year 2019/20. The RFP Rules is available on the Supplier Documents page of the RFP Website:

  http://pecoprocurement.com/index.cfm?s=supplierInformation&p=documents
  
  02/21/2019 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-56:
  Is it possible to submit more than one Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit with our Part 1 Proposal?
  
  No, an RFP Bidder can only submit one Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit. An RFP Bidder that submits a Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit will receive a review of any proposed modifications within two business days. The Independent Evaluator sends such review by email. Any review communicated to the RFP Bidder of the Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is final. The RFP Bidder cannot submit a subsequent request for changes on the basis of this review.
  
  02/21/2019 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-55:
  When is the Guaranty Intent Insert (#P2-2) due?
  
  The Guaranty Intent Insert (#P2-2), if required, is submitted with the Part 2 Proposal. An RFP Bidder that is relying on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor and is not a Default Supplier must provide a complete Guaranty Intent Insert (#P2-2) by upload to the online Part 2 Form. If the RFP Bidder is a Default Supplier, the Guaranty Intent Insert (#P2-2) is not required. A Default Supplier is a supplier selected through this RFP to provide Default Supply for a particular Class and is approved by the Commission.
  
  02/21/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-54:
  On February 20, 2019 the Independent Evaluator posted a revised Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit. What changes were made in this version from the prior version posted January 7, 2019?
  
  The only change made to the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit (Appendix 9 to the RFP Rules) posted on February 20, 2019 from the prior version was to update the earliest acceptable Expiration Date in Paragraph 1 to March 27, 2019.
  
  02/20/2019 in General , Credit
  
  
• FAQ-53:
  If an RFP Bidder and/or members of the Bidder Team are expecting to change their location and contact information after the submission of the Part 1 Proposal, which information should the RFP Bidder use in the online form?
  
  Throughout the solicitation, the phone numbers and email addresses provided in your Proposal are used primarily by the Independent Evaluator for communicating with the RFP Bidder. As such you should provide information current as of the date of submittal. Further, we suggest, but do not require: (i) providing a cell phone number (rather than only a workplace number) for the Representative and Nominees; and (ii) noting in the justification of omissions (Section 6) that your contact information is subject to change.

  Should you have one or more winning Bids, you will have an opportunity to provide updated contact information to pecoprocurement@nera.com prior to the mailing of the Uniform SMA and Confirmation(s) in hard copy.
  
  02/20/2019 in General
  
  

• FAQ-52:
  Does the hourly load data provided in the Data Room include transmission and distribution loss factors?
  
  The hourly load data provided in the Data Room includes both applicable distribution and transmission losses. These hourly load values will be de-rated by PJM for marginal losses prior to energy settlement. PECO provides hourly marginal loss deration factors in the Data Room. Please see Section 3.a.iii. Assumptions on page 10 of the data description document for assumptions and additional information related to the hourly energy data provided.
  
  02/14/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-51:
  If the RFP Bidder does not meet the creditworthiness requirements under the Uniform SMA and does not rely on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor or submit a Proposal under an Agency Agreement, what credit related documents are required with the Part 1 Proposal? Also, in this case, please confirm that the RFP Bidder must provide a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit with the Part 2 Proposal and a Guaranty upon signing the Uniform SMA.
  
  For purposes of completing the Part 1 Proposal, the RFP Bidder will confirm, under Section 2. Financial Requirements and Agency Agreements of the online part 1 form, that it is relying on its own financial standing and provide the following information, if available:
  1. Financial information including the most recent quarterly financial information for the RFP Bidder, including a balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement and any accompanying notes and schedules. If available, the RFP Bidder must provide the most recent Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q or 10-K (whichever is more recent) to fulfill this requirement. If the SEC Form 10-Q or 10-K is unavailable, please provide, if available, the RFP Bidder’s most recent quarterly, monthly, or bi-annual financial information accompanied by an attestation by the Chief Financial Officer (or similar position) that the information contained in the financial statements fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of the RFP Bidder. The requirements for this attestation are provided more specifically in Appendix 5 of the RFP Rules.
  2. All available credit ratings for the RFP Bidder from S&P Global Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc, and Fitch, Inc.

  If this information is not available, the RFP Bidder must justify fully any omission in Section 6. Justification of Omissions.

  If RFP Bidder does not meet the creditworthiness requirements under the Uniform SMA then it will not be granted any Unsecured Credit. An executed guaranty would not be required since the RFP Bidder is not relying on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor. Instead, should the RFP Bidder have winning Bid(s) that are approved the Commission, the RFP Bidder must post any required performance assurance collateral in the form of cash or a letter of credit by close of March 19, 2019, the fifth business day after the Bid Date. Under the Uniform SMA, the amount that a Default Supplier is required to post for fixed-price products is based on Mark-to-Market exposure calculations (see Appendix B - Buyer’s Exposure Calculation Information) and for spot-priced products is $250,000 per tranche.

  With the Part 2 Proposal, each RFP Bidder must submit a single Pre-Bid Letter of Credit in an amount of at least: (i) $250,000 per tranche bid on products for the Residential and Small Commercial Classes; and (ii) $125,000 per tranche bid on a CCI product (if applicable). The Part 2 Proposal is submitted during the Part 2 Window, which opens on March 1, 2019 and closes on March 7, 2019. Please note that an RFP Bidder may request modifications that are non-material in nature, or that are advantageous to both PECO and the RFP Bidder with its Part 1 Proposal. The Part 1 Proposal is submitted during the Part 1 Window, which opens on February 20, 2019 and closes on February 26, 2019.
  
  01/14/2019 in Credit
  
  

• FAQ-50:
  If we plan to incorporate any of the modifications listed in the Acceptable Modifications to the Standard Guaranty will the guaranty form still be considered a “Standard Guaranty” or must it now meet the requirements of an “alternate guaranty form”?
  
  A guaranty that is in the form of the Standard Guaranty (appended as Appendix G to the Uniform SMA) and incorporates any of the modifications listed in the Acceptable Modifications to the Standard Guaranty is considered a “Standard Guaranty” and not an “alternate guaranty form”.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-49:
  We are considering relying on the financial standing of a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor. Can a Default Supplier that relied on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor for purposes of meeting the qualification standards under the PECO RFP initially issue a Post-Bid Letter of Credit to meet any credit requirements under the Uniform SMA and then have the RFP Guarantor execute a guaranty at a later date?
  
  Yes, a Default Supplier that relied on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor for purposes of meeting the qualification standards under the PECO RFP, can initially issue a Post-Bid Letter of Credit to meet any credit requirements under the Uniform SMA by close of the fifth business day after the Bid Date and then have the RFP Guarantor execute a guaranty at a later date.

  We note that you are considering relying on a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor. Please note that the Part 1 Proposal and Part 2 Proposal process held during a solicitation is an opportunity for an RFP Bidder that relies on the financial standing of a Foreign Entity as an RFP Guarantor to submit to PECO for review the additional documents required by the Uniform SMA and listed in V.5 of the RFP Rules.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-48:
  If the RFP Guarantor is a Foreign Entity, are we required to request the deletion of the parenthetical [a state of the United States or of the district of Columbia] in the first paragraph of the Standard Guaranty as a modification to this document? Would we request this modification through the Alternate Guaranty Process?
  
  If the RFP Guarantor is a Foreign Entity, the parenthetical [a state of the United States or of the district of Columbia] must be deleted from the guaranty. This deletion is not considered a modification and an RFP Bidder need not submit a Draft Guaranty in its Part 1 Proposal to request the deletion of this parenthetical.

  Please note that the Alternate Guaranty Process is not a process by which suppliers may propose modifications to the Standard Guaranty. There are two distinct processes regarding a guaranty. First, an RFP Bidder may, in its Part 1 Proposal, request modifications to the Standard Guaranty that are non?material in nature, or that are advantageous to both PECO and the RFP Bidder. An RFP Bidder requests a modification to the Standard Guaranty by submitting a Draft Guaranty substantially in the form of the Standard Guaranty indicating clearly any and all modifications to the Standard Guaranty. Second, the Alternate Guaranty Process allows a prospective supplier that is unable to use the Standard Guaranty provided as Appendix G to the Uniform SMA to submit for consideration by PECO a guaranty that the prospective supplier uses in its normal course of business. Such a guaranty, an “alternate guaranty form”, must meet a number of requirements including the fact that the guaranty must be for unlimited liability (while the Standard Guaranty has a liability limit). A prospective supplier wishing to have PECO evaluate an alternate guaranty must initiate the process by making a request for such consideration no later than January 29, 2019, which is fifteen (15) business days prior to the opening of the Part 1 Window. Other requirements also apply to an alternate guaranty form and will be provided in Appendix 2 - Alternate Guaranty Process Document.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-47:
  We are considering relying on the financial standing of a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor. Is it the case that the RFP Guarantor must be a parent or affiliate of the RFP Bidder?
  
  The RFP Guarantor need not be an affiliate of the RFP Bidder.

  We note that you are considering relying on a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor. For your convenience, we summarize some key requirements.

  • It is a requirement of the Uniform SMA to have the following documents:
    
    • a legal opinion of outside counsel qualified to practice in the foreign jurisdiction in which the RFP Guarantor is incorporated or otherwise formed that the guaranty pursuant to the Uniform SMA is, or upon the completion of execution formalities will become, the binding obligation of the RFP Guarantor in the jurisdiction in which it has been incorporated or otherwise formed; and
    • the sworn certificate of the corporate secretary (or similar officer) of such RFP Guarantor that the person executing the guaranty pursuant to the Uniform SMA on behalf of the RFP Guarantor has the authority to execute the guaranty pursuant to the Uniform SMA and that the governing board of such RFP Guarantor has approved the execution of the guaranty pursuant to the Uniform SMA; and
    • the sworn certificate of the corporate secretary (or similar officer) of such RFP Guarantor that the RFP Guarantor has been authorized by its governing board to enter into agreements of the same type as the guaranty pursuant to the Uniform SMA.

  These documents are required in order for the RFP Guarantor to be granted unsecured credit and thus for the RFP bidder to be able to rely on the financial standing of the RFP Guarantor under the terms of the Uniform SMA.

  If you are considering relying on a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor, to ensure you can meet the requirements under the Uniform SMA, the proposal requirements are:

  • Part 1 Proposal: Submit additional evidence of creditworthiness (optional), acknowledge the documents listed above are required with the Part 2 Proposal in order for the Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor to be granted unsecured credit, and submit a draft of any of the documents above for evaluation by PECO (optional).
  • Part 2 Proposal: Submit executed versions of the additional documents listed above and if the documents are not sufficient, the Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor is not granted unsecured credit and the RFP Bidder may not rely on the financial standing of the RFP Guarantor. In this case, the Independent Evaluator may request additional financial or credit information regarding the RFP Bidder.

   
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-46:
  We do not have an RFP Guarantor that meets the creditworthiness requirements under the Uniform SMA. Does this mean that we cannot participate in the PECO RFP?
  
  An unrated entity or an entity with a credit rating below BBB- for S&P and/or Fitch or below Baa3 from Moody’s would not be granted any Unsecured Credit and cannot serve as an RFP Guarantor under the terms of the Uniform SMA (see Appendix A). It is not a requirement for an RFP Bidder to be rated or to rely on the financial standing of a Guarantor that meets the creditworthiness requirements in order to participate in the PECO RFP. In this case, the RFP Bidder would not be granted any Unsecured Credit and must post any required performance assurance collateral in the form of cash or a letter of credit.
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-45:
  What products will be available in the March 2019 Solicitation?
  
  The March 2019 Solicitation, which is the fifth solicitation under PECO’s DSP IV, will seek to procure full requirements service for three classes of customers: the Residential (“RES”) Class, the Small Commercial (“SC”) Class, and the Consolidated Large Commercial and Industrial (“CCI”) Class. A product for purposes of this RFP is defined by three characteristics: a) the Class to which it contributes Default Supply; b) the length of the supply period; and c) the date at which the supply period begins. For example, the RES?12?Jun19 product represents Default Supply for the RES Class for the supply period from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2020. The products available in the March 2019 Solicitation are RES-12-Jun19 (12 tranches), RES-24-Jun19 (11 tranches), SC-12-Jun19 (6 tranches), SC-24-Jun19 (3 tranches), and CCI-12-Jun19 (8 tranches).
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-44:
  Where can I find the schedule of procurement of products and tentative calendars for future solicitations under DSP IV?
  
  The schedule of procurement of products under PECO’s DSP IV is provided in Table I-3 of the RFP Rules. The tentative schedules for future solicitations under PECO’s DSP IV are provided in Appendix 11 to the RFP Rules.

  The Bid Date for the March 2019 Solicitation will be Tuesday, March 12, 2019. To submit bids in this solicitation, a supplier must present its qualifications through the submission of a Part 1 Proposal by 12 PM (noon) EPT on February 26, 2019.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  

• FAQ-43:
  Can the Independent Evaluator provide the word version of the Uniform SMA?
  
  Can the IndepThe Uniform SMA is available in PDF format on the Supplier Information page of the RFP website. A word version is not available. The Independent Evaluator will prepare the Uniform SMA, including all Exhibits, for each New Default Supplier, and send these documents to PECO on the day the Commission approves some or all of the winning Bids. ndent Evaluator provide the word version of the Uniform SMA?
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-42:
  Does the Independent Evaluator require hardcopies of the Inserts, or are scans sufficient?
  
  Hardcopies are not required. The RFP Bidder provides a copy of the required Inserts by upload to the online forms.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-41:
  The Bidder Information Session presentation refers to PECO’s NYPA allocation as a MW allocation. Does that refer to a block energy MW allocation (i.e. flat across all hours)?
  
  No, the MW provided in the Bidder Information Session refers to cleared capacity in the PJM RPM Auction, and it is not a flat MWh amount.

  Please note that the daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data for the Residential class are not adjusted for the NYPA allocation. Hourly load data for the Residential Class, which is broken down by load related to PECO’s default service customers (“Default Energy”) and load related to customers who have elected to be supplied by an Electric Generation Supplier (“EGS Energy”), is handled differently. In regards to the hourly load data for the Residential class, PECO subtracts the NYPA allocation from the Default Energy (MWh) column and adds a corresponding amount to the EGS Energy (MWh) column.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  

• FAQ-40:
  Is the Residential Class carved out of the definition of DS Load as it is written in the SMA?
  
  The Residential Class is not carved out of the definition of DS Load; rather, the definition points out that for the Residential Class, DS Load is not synonymous with the aggregate load of DS Customers in that Class. For each of the Small Commercial Class and the Consolidated Large Commercial and Industrial Class, DS Load is exactly the aggregate load of DS Customers being provided DS Supply. For the Residential Class, DS Load is the aggregate load of DS Customers being provided DS Supply except for a fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-39:
  Is there a cap on the number of tranches that an RFP Bidder can potentially bid?
  
  Yes, an RFP Bidder may have a Load Cap. The Independent Evaluator prepares an electronic Bid Form for each RFP Bidder qualified pursuant to a successful Part 1 Proposal. If the RFP Bidder cannot bid on all tranches available of a product because of the Load Cap for the Class to which such product belongs and because of tranches previously won by the RFP Bidder, the Bid Form reflects that fact.

  Generally speaking, each Class has “Load Caps”, which are limits on the number of tranches of Default Supply that an RFP Bidder can bid and serve for that Class. The Load Caps ensure that there will be a diversified pool of Default Suppliers for each Class. The Load Caps for a Class are set so that the Default Service customers of that Class have no more than a 50% exposure to anyone Default Supplier at any given time. If two or more Default Suppliers are affiliated, the Load Caps will apply jointly to such group of Default Suppliers. More information on Load Caps is provided in paragraphs 1.2.10 and 1.2.11 of the RFP Rules.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  

• FAQ-38:
  Will DS Suppliers be responsible for Transmission Enhancement charges?
  
  PECO is the responsible party for Transmission Enhancement charges (ID #1108). Appendix D to the Uniform SMA provides the PJM Billing Statement line items, including transmission charges, and the responsible party (Buyer or Seller) for each item.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-37:
  In the Uniform SMA Insert (#P1-4), an RFP Bidder is given the option to add subsection 5.4(a)(1). What calculation is used to calculate quantities if the RFP Bidder chooses to not add this subsection?
  
  If you opt for the notional quantity provision, under an event of default future quantities are determined by looking at quantities from the previous calendar year and making any adjustments for DS Load changes (i.e., for current switching levels). In that manner, historical data is used and the quantities largely are pre-specified. The alternative is expected to be to use a forecast that would be made at the time of default; under such an option the quantities could not be pre-specified.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-36:
  Can I use the same Pre-Bid and Post-Bid Letters of Credit from the previous solicitation?
  
  The Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is reviewed anew in each solicitation. It is the responsibility of the RFP Bidder to ensure that the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is in the form of the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit or incorporates only modifications that have been approved by PECO and posted on the RFP website.

  The current list of approved modifications to the Standard Pre-Bid and Post-Bid Letters of Credit are posted at the bottom of the Supplier Documents page of the RFP website here under the heading “Credit Instruments – March 2019”. A final list of approved modifications will be posted by 12PM (noon) on the day the Part 2 Window opens, March 1, 2019. Each RFP Bidder may use any of the approved modifications, regardless of whether the RFP Bidder itself or another RFP Bidder proposed the modification.
  
  01/08/2019 in General , Credit
  
  

• FAQ-35:
  Is it required for the RFP Bidder to be registered to do business in the state of Pennsylvania?
  
  No, it is not a requirement under the Uniform SMA for suppliers to be registered to do business in the state of Pennsylvania. Please see Section 3.1 of the Pennsylvania Default Service Supplier Master Agreement (“Uniform SMA”) which states, the DS Supplier “is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other legal entity, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or, if another jurisdiction, under the laws of such jurisdiction and, in such case, is duly registered and authorized to do business in such other jurisdiction.”
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract , General
  
  
• FAQ-34:
  Is a Default Supplier under DSP IV that has winning Bids that are approved by the Commission in a subsequent solicitation under DSP IV required to execute a new guaranty?
  
  A Default Supplier that has already executed a guaranty with PECO under DSP IV is not required to execute a new guaranty if they win additional tranches in a subsequent solicitation under DSP IV. Instead, the Default Supplier will amend the amount of the existing guaranty to reflect the newly won tranches.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-33:
  May suppliers propose modifications to the Standard Guaranty through the Alternate Guaranty Process?
  
  No. The Alternate Guaranty Process allows a supplier who is unable to use the Standard Guaranty provided as Appendix G to the Uniform SMA to submit for consideration by PECO a guaranty that the supplier uses in its normal course of business. Such a guaranty is called an “alternate guaranty form”, and the process by which suppliers may obtain approval to use an alternate guaranty form is described in Appendix 2 of the RFP Rules. The Alternate Guaranty Process is not a process by which suppliers may propose modifications to the Standard Guaranty.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-32:
  Can you provide an update on interval meter deployment? Which rate classes and strata will be interval metered at full deployment?
  
  As of July 25, 2018, interval meters have been fully deployed with the exception of a few straggler accounts. Interval meters were installed for the rate schedules and strata indicated in the table below. Please note that only unmetered service are marked “No”.

  Rate Schedule	Strata	Interval Metered
  AL	177	No
  EP	161	Yes
  GS	101	Yes
  GS	107	Yes
  HT	151	Yes
  PD	157	Yes
  POL	173	No
  R	111	Yes
  R	112	Yes
  R	113	Yes
  RH	121	Yes
  RH	122	Yes
  RH	123	Yes
  SLE	170	No
  SLS	171	No
  TL	175	No
  TL	176	No

  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-31:
  Is there a credit-based tranche cap in the PECO RFP?
  
  No, there is no cap on the number of tranches for which an RFP Bidder can bid on based on the credit assessment for the entity on which that RFP Bidder is relying. There are, however, load caps for a Class that are set so that the Default Service customers of that Class have no more than a 50% exposure to any one Default Supplier at any given time.
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit , Rules
  
  
• FAQ-30:
  Is a PECO Default Supplier assigned customers?
  
  A Default Supplier provides full-requirements service for the percentage of PECO’s Default Load that corresponds to the number of tranches won by the supplier for a given Class (Residential (“RES”), Small Commercial (“SC”), or Consolidated Large Commercial and Industrial (“CCI”)). The stated percentage share is a percentage of the load of all PECO customers in a Class. Customers are not assigned to Suppliers.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-29:
  What is the deadline for Bidders to provide modifications to the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit?
  
  An RFP Bidder may request modifications that are non-material in nature, or that are advantageous to both PECO and the RFP Bidder with its Part 1 Proposal. The Part 1 Proposal is submitted during the Part 1 Window, which opens on February 20, 2019 and closes on February 26, 2019.

  An RFP Bidder requests modifications to the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit by submitting a Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit substantially in the form of the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit indicating clearly any and all modifications to the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit. The Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit must be submitted in Microsoft Word with tracked changes by upload to the online Part 1 Form.
  
  01/08/2019 in General , Credit
  
  

• FAQ-28:
  Does a Bidder submit a single Pre-Bid Letter of Credit for all products on which it plans to bid?
  
  An RFP Bidder must, in its Part 2 Proposal, submit a single Pre-Bid Letter of Credit in an amount of at least: (i) $250,000 per tranche bid on products for the Residential and Small Commercial Classes; and (ii) $125,000 per tranche bid on a CCI product (if applicable). This Pre-Bid Letter of Credit must be in the form of the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit provided as Appendix 9 to the RFP Rules or must incorporate only modifications that have been approved by PECO and posted to the RFP website.
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-27:
  Are Default Suppliers responsible for providing any of the services or products included in full requirements service for the fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”)?
  
  No. Default Load for the Residential Class is reduced by a fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”). Default Suppliers are not responsible for providing any of the services or products included in full requirements service for NYPA supply.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-26:
  Are the data series in the data room adjusted for the NYPA allocation?
  
  The daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data for the Residential class are not adjusted for the NYPA allocation. Hourly load data for the Residential Class, which is broken down by load related to PECO’s default service customers (“Default Energy”) and load related to customers who have elected to be supplied by an Electric Generation Supplier (“EGS Energy”), is handled differently. In regards to the hourly load data for the Residential class, PECO subtracts the NYPA allocation from the Default Energy (MWh) column and adds a corresponding amount to the EGS Energy (MWh) column.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-25:
  Can RFP Bidders request modifications to the Uniform SMA?
  
  The Uniform SMA was approved by the Commission in Docket No. P-2016-2534980 and comments will not be accepted at this time. RFP Bidders that apply to participate in the PECO RFP are required to accept all of the terms of the Uniform SMA without modifications. The Uniform SMA is posted on the Supplier Documents page of the RFP website as Appendix 1 to the RFP Rules:

  http://www.pecoprocurement.com/index.cfm?s=supplierInformation&p=documents
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-24:
  To whom should we send electronic versions of the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit once it has been issued?
  
  The hardcopy executed Pre-Bid Letter of Credit must be sent by overnight delivery service to the Independent Evaluator at the address provided below. RFP Bidders may, but are not required to, upload an electronic executed version of the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit to the online Part 2 Form for evaluation. The hardcopy Pre-Bid Letter of Credit and any electronic version should not be sent to PECO.

  NERA - Independent Evaluator
  PECO Default Service Program RFPs
  1835 Market Street, Suite 1205 Philadelphia, PA 19103
  
  01/08/2019 in General , Credit
  
  

• FAQ-23:
  Does a Default Supplier under DSP IV that wins tranches in a subsequent solicitation under DSP IV execute a new Uniform SMA?
  
  A Default Supplier under DSP IV that has winning Bids that are approved by the Commission in a subsequent solicitation under DSP IV will execute one Transaction Confirmation for each product for which it has winning Bids and will not execute a new Uniform SMA.

  Please refer to paragraph I.3.6 of the RFP Rules, which states, "PECO and each such RFP Bidder execute a single Uniform SMA during the course of DSP IV. Each solicitation, PECO and each such RFP Bidder execute one Transaction Confirmation for each product for which such RFP Bidder has Bids that are approved by the Commission". The RFP Rules is available on the RFP website here:

  http://www.pecoprocurement.com/index.cfm?s=supplierInformation&p=documents
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-22:
  What is the required amount of the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit?
  
  An RFP Bidder must, in its Part 2 Proposal, submit a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit in an amount of at least: (i) $250,000 per tranche bid on products for the Residential and Small Commercial Classes; and (ii) $125,000 per tranche bid on a CCI product (if applicable). This Pre-Bid Letter of Credit must be in the form of the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit provided as Appendix 9 to the RFP Rules or must incorporate only modifications that have been approved by PECO and posted to the RFP website. For more information on the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit see V.2 in the RFP Rules:

  http://www.pecoprocurement.com/index.cfm?s=supplierInformation&p=documents
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit
  
  

• FAQ-21:
  Is it acceptable to rely on the financial standing of a Foreign Guarantor?
  
  Yes, RFP Bidders may rely on the financial standing of a Foreign Guarantor. Please see Paragraphs IV.5. and V.5. of the RFP Rules for additional requirements applicable to RFP Bidders with Foreign Guarantors. The RFP Rules are available on the Supplier Documents page of the RFP website:

  http://www.pecoprocurement.com/index.cfm?s=supplierInformation&p=documents
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit
  
  

• FAQ-20:
  If the State of Pennsylvania increases the AEPS obligation, is the Default Supplier responsible for the incremental cost?
  
  Yes. Please see Appendix E of the Pennsylvania Default Service Supplier Master Agreement (“Uniform SMA”) which states, “If AEPS requirements change by law or any other reason, DS Supplier shall be responsible for providing the credits at its expense in order to comply with its obligations under Full Requirements Service.”
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-19:
  Is cash an acceptable form of pre-bid security?
  
  No, cash is not an acceptable form of pre-bid security. An RFP Bidder must either use the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit available on the RFP website here, or a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit that incorporates only those modifications to the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit that have been approved by PECO and posted to the RFP website.
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit , Rules
  
  
• FAQ-18:
  Who can sign the certifications required for the Part 1 Proposal?
  
  Please see Paragraph III.1.13 of the RFP Rules. For a given solicitation, all representations and certifications required by the RFP, including those required for the Part 1 Proposal and Part 2 Proposal, must be made by a single individual who serves as Officer of the RFP Bidder. An Officer of the RFP Bidder is an individual authorized to undertake contracts (including the Uniform SMA) and bind the RFP Bidder.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-17:
  In Exhibit 1, Transaction Confirmation, included in Appendix C of the Uniform SMA, there are blanks to provide the average costs for the Alternative Energy Credits (AECs). Will PECO provide these numbers to a winning bidder or are these numbers to be provided by the Seller?
  
  Default Suppliers are responsible for providing the AECs necessary for PECO to meet its obligations under the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (“AEPS”) Act during the term of the Uniform SMA. The obligations of Default Suppliers in this regard are reduced by the AECs procured separately by PECO. The blanks in the Transaction Confirmation are for the Default Supplier to provide a price for each type of AEC (Tier I, Tier I Solar, and Tier II) that is included in the RFP Bidder’s winning Bids. As specified in the RFP Rules (see Paragraph V.1.2), each such price must be greater than $0/AEC. The RFP Bidder will be required to certify in its Part 2 Proposal that it will comply with this obligation.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-16:
  On what volumes are the percentages listed for Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards (“AEPS”) compliance based?
  
  AEPS quantities are based on electric energy sold by an Electric Distribution Company (EDC) or Electric Generation Supplier (EGS) to retail electric customers. AEPS obligations are calculated based on the retail load, which is delivered energy at the retail meter and does not include marginal losses.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-15:
  When are the solicitation results announced?
  
  Within fifteen (15) days of the close of the solicitation, the Independent Evaluator releases the weighted average price as well as the percentage of load represented by each tranche for each product procured in that solicitation. When the results become available, the Independent Evaluator will make an announcement, and you will be able to access the results here: Background/Previous Results.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-14:
  Is the historical hourly load data posted to the RFP website weather-normalized? How does PECO forecast load data? Does PECO forecast weather-normalized loads or is the monthly load forecast based on expected weather?
  
  PECO does not make available forecasted data in the context of its Default Service Program RFP. The hourly load data posted to the RFP website is historical and not weather-normalized. Peak Load Contribution (“PLC”) values are based on the weather-normalized five coincident summer peaks from the prior year as per PJM methodology. PJM Manual 19 documents how peak load is weather-normalized. For more information on data series posted to the Data Room of the RFP website, please refer to the Data Description document.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-13:
  The monthly hourly load data in the Data Room section of the RFP website lists load (MWh) which is separated by “EGS load”, “PECO Default service load”, and “Total Energy”. Which of these three data series are used for settlement purposes by PECO for customers that are not hourly metered?
  
  Each Default Service supplier is paid, in any given hour, on the basis of the share of the total Default Service load that the supplier is serving for each class in that hour. The supplier share is calculated based on the number of awarded tranches for each class times the percent size of each tranche. The hourly loads under the “EGS” category posted in the Data Room correspond to PECO’s retail customers who have elected to be supplied by an Electric Generation Supplier, and therefore do not belong to PECO load settlements, regardless of whether they are hourly metered or not.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-12:
  Are the names of winning RFP Bidders posted to the RFP website?
  
  No, the names of winning RFP Bidders are not publicly available.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-11:
  Where can I find the static load profile info for PECO?
  
  The static load profile data is located on the "Additional Data" page in the Data Room on the RFP website here. PECO started applying this static load profile data to monthly-metered customers (those without interval meters) on January 1, 2011. Please note that from 2006 through 2010, PECO developed hourly load data by customer group for monthly-metered customers using other older profiles and will not be able to retrofit the new load profiles to the historical hourly load data that is provided in the Data Room. For additional information, please see page 3 of the Data Description Document available here.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-10:
  Where can I find a comprehensive list of historical default service rates for each customer class?
  
  PECO posts a Default Service rate calculation model that translates the prices determined through this RFP into Default Service rates or “Price to Compare” ("PTC") by customer class since 2011. These PTCs are available on the Company website here below the heading 'PTC Archive':

  www.peco.com/MyAccount/MyService/Pages/ElectricPricetoCompare.aspx
  
  
  01/08/2019 in Rates
  
  

• FAQ-9:
  For the remaining Residential Default Load served by PECO, will PECO pay for all of the cost of full requirements service or only the cost of energy and AECs?
  
  In regards to the remaining Default Load, PECO will be a Load Serving Entity in PJM and will acquire all necessary supply through PJM-administered markets and will obtain sufficient Alternative Energy Credits (“AECs”) at market prices to satisfy any near-term obligations under the AEPS Act. Default Suppliers are not responsible for any of the costs related to the portion of the Default Load of the Residential Class served by PECO.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-8:
  Is the hourly load data posted in the Data Room for wholesale energy?
  
  As stated in the data description document, the hourly load data provided in the Data Room on the RFP website includes applicable distribution and transmission losses. These values will be de-rated by PJM for marginal losses prior to energy settlement. PECO provides hourly marginal loss deration factors in the Data Room.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-7:
  Is a price on the Bid Form a price for a single tranche? Or does the price associated with the second tranche represent a price offered for two tranches?
  
  Each price on the Bid Form is for a single tranche. A “Bid” is a price in $/MWh for one tranche of a given product.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-6:
  What happens if my Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is not sufficient to support my Bids?
  
  Please see paragraph VII.2.10 of the RFP Rules. The Independent Evaluator will determine for such RFP Bidder the greatest number of whole tranches that its Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is sufficient to support. The Independent Evaluator will strike a Bid from a Bid Form for any tranche that is not supported by the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit. The Independent Evaluator will remove a Bid first from the product where there is most competition, as measured by the ratio of the number of tranches bid to the number of tranches needed. For that product, the Independent Evaluator will start with the tranche that has the highest Bid. If more than one RFP Bidder submitted Pre-Bid Letters of Credit that are insufficient to support the number of tranches bid by each such RFP Bidder, the Independent Evaluator will first modify the Bid Form from the RFP Bidder whose Bid Form is received last.
  
  01/08/2019 in Credit , Rules
  
  
• FAQ-5:
  Are Default Suppliers required to have a retail electricity license within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in order to qualify as a Default Supplier?
  
  No, it is not a requirement under the Uniform SMA for suppliers to have a retail electricity license within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. When the PaPUC approves the results of a solicitation, it approves the bid prices that will determine retail rates and the winning suppliers that will provide supply to meet the load of Default Supply customers.
  
  01/08/2019 in Contract , General
  
  
• FAQ-4:
  Do all winning bidders of a product receive the highest winning price for that product or does each winning bidder for a product receive the price as stated on their bid form?
  
  For each product in this solicitation, a Default Supplier will be paid a supplier-specific price for each MWh of electric load served as specified in the Transaction Confirmation for that product. The supplier-specific price for a product will be the average of approved Bids for that Default Supplier and for that product, as provided in the Bid Form.
  
  01/08/2019 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-3:
  Are the Hourly PJM Deration Factors for the PECO Zone provided in Eastern Standard Time or Eastern Prevailing Time?
  
  Hourly reports align with Eastern Prevailing Time. For instance, Hour 1 pertains to the hour between 12:00 a.m. EPT and 1:00 a.m. EPT. Daylight Savings Time (DST) is treated as follows:
  • Hourly reports spanning the Fall DST period contain 25 consecutive hours.
  • Hourly reports spanning the Spring DST period contain 23 consecutive hours.

  For more information please see the Data Description document posted to the Data Room.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-2:
  What was the timeline of the Medium Commercial Class transition from default service on a fixed-price basis to default service on an hourly-price basis?
  
  On June 1, 2016, PECO’s non-residential customers with a Peak Load Contribution between 100kW and 500kW, known as the Medium Commercial Class until May 31, 2017, transitioned from default service on a fixed-price basis to default service on an hourly-price basis with energy priced to the PJM day-ahead spot market. Starting June 1, 2017, these customers were merged with PECO’s Large Commercial & Industrial Class, non-residential customers with a Peak Load Contribution greater than 500kW, to form the Consolidated Commercial & Industrial Class (“CCI”). CCI customers will receive default service on an hourly-price basis with energy priced to the PJM day-ahead spot market.
  
  01/08/2019 in General
  
  
• FAQ-1:
  In the hourly load data file, for the CCI-GS rate schedule, the Default Energy (MWh) is negative for hours 10-13 on 10/27/2017. Also, for those same hours, in the Unaccounted For Energy (UFE) file, the Total Zone UFE (MW) is positive. Please confirm that the data is correct.
  
  The values provided for the Default Energy (MWh) for the CCI-GS rate schedule and the Total Zone UFE in hours 10-13 on 10/27/2017 should be disregarded due to metering error.
  
  01/08/2019 in Data
  
  

www.nera.com

www.peco.com

Privacy Policy