Contact Us

FAQ Archives - DSP V - March 2024 Solicitation

The FAQs on this page are no longer relevant, as they are from past solicitations.  These FAQs are posted here only for reference purposes.  Do not rely on the information provided on this page for the current solicitation.

• FAQ-63:
  Can an RFP Bidder that does not have winning Bids approved by the Commission in a solicitation under DSP V execute the Uniform SMA in order to have an abbreviated contract execution process in subsequent solicitations?
  
  As stated in Paragraph VII.3.1 of the RFP Rules, “the winning RFP Bidders and PECO must execute the Uniform SMAs and Transaction Confirmations within three (3) days of acceptance of the results by the Commission.” There is no process for an RFP Bidder that does not have winning Bids approved by the Commission to execute the Uniform SMA.
   
  Previously eligible RFP Bidders, which are RFP Bidders that become eligible to bid for a solicitation under DSP V, participate in an abbreviated Part 1 and Part 2 proposal process in subsequent solicitations by using the Short Part 1 Form and Short Part 2 Form to respond to the qualification requirements.
   
  03/07/2024 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-62:
  Does PECO provide example invoices or historical costs for the various components of full requirements?
  
  Example invoices and historical costs for the various components of full requirements are not available from PECO or the Independent Evaluator. Appendix D to the Uniform SMA provides the PJM Billing Statement line items and the responsible party (Buyer or Seller) for each item. Additionally, you can find historical weighted average winning bid prices from prior solicitations available on the PECO RFP website.
  
  03/01/2024 in General
  
  
• FAQ-61:
  Have there been any changes to the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit since the September 2023 Solicitation?
  
  The Pre-Bid Letter of Credit for the March 2024 Solicitation is available on the Supplier Information page of the RFP website and is dated December 21, 2023. Three administrative changes have been made to the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit since the September 2023 Solicitation:

  1) The expiry date in Paragraph 1 was updated to no earlier than March 27, 2024;

  2) The field for PECO’s telephone number was replaced with a field for their email address in Paragraph 7; and

  3) The list of titles in the definition of “Authorized Officer” was updated in Paragraph 12.

  The Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is provided in word format and RFP Bidders may use this document to make a redline to a prior version posted. The Pre-Bid Letter of Credit is due with the Part 2 Proposal by Thursday, March 7, 2024.
  
  02/15/2024 in Credit
  
  

• FAQ-60:
  Have there been any changes to the Uniform SMA since the September 2023 Solicitation?
  
  Yes, on December 22, 2023, PECO petitioned to modify its Uniform SMA for its Default Service Program V (“DSP V”) to add a new, optional Appendix I, which incorporates the International Swaps and Derivatives Association 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol (“ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol”). The Commission approved PECO’s petition on February 1, 2024 in Docket No. P-2023-3045119. RFP Bidders that adhere to the ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol may elect for both the RFP Bidder and PECO to execute Appendix I at the point of contract execution to incorporate necessary terms of the ISDA U.S. Stay Protocol. RFP Bidders that intend to execute Appendix I at the point of contract execution will indicate this election to the Independent Evaluator in the Part 1 Proposal. Please see Appendix I of the Uniform SMA, dated February 1, 2024, posted to the RFP website for additional information.

  The modification to add this new, entirely optional Appendix I to the Uniform SMA beginning with this March 2024 Solicitation is the only modification made since the Uniform SMA was approved for PECO’s DSP V by the Commission on December 3, 2020.
  
  02/15/2024 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-59:
  Has PECO petitioned the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“Commission”) for approval to modify its fifth default service program (“DSP V”) Default Service Supplier Master Agreement (“SMA”) to incorporate the 2018 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol?
  
  On December 22, 2023, PECO petitioned to modify its DSP V SMA to add a new Appendix I which incorporates the 2018 ISDA U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol (Docket No. P-2023-3045119). This addition would enable market participants subject to the regulations issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (12 C.F.R. §§ 252.2, 252.81-88), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (12 C.F.R. §§ 382.1-7) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (12 C.F.R. §§ 47.1-8) to participate in the PECO’s default service solicitations.

  PECO is seeking expedited approval of the addition of Appendix I to the DSP V SMA on or before the Commission’s public meeting scheduled for February 1, 2024 to be used in the upcoming March 2024 solicitation.
  
  01/08/2024 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-58:
  Is the daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) or the daily network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data scaled using the daily zonal scaling factors?
  
  The daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data provided in Data Room are not scaled by the daily zonal scaling factor. The daily zonal scaling factors are provided in the file “PECO Daily Zonal Scaling Factor”.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-57:
  Is the daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data adjusted for the NYPA allocation? Why is the sum of the values across the detail sheets not always exactly equal to the values on the summary sheet in the “PECO R PLC&NSPL Data” file?
  
  The daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data for the Residential class are not adjusted for the NYPA allocation. The differences are due to the loss of precision—the Summary Sheet and Detail Sheet are published independently to one decimal. As a result, the summary sheet is a more accurate representation of total than adding up details.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-56:
  Have any modifications been made to the products available in the March 2024 Solicitation or to the Uniform SMA due to the delayed PJM Base Residual Auction ("BRA") for the 2025/26 delivery year?
  
  No modifications will be made to the products available in the March 2024 Solicitation or to the Uniform SMA due to the delayed PJM Base Residual Auction (“BRA”) for the 2025/26 delivery year.

  PJM’s Base Residual Auction (“BRA”) for the 2025/26 delivery year was delayed due to FERC proceedings. The delayed BRA for the 2025/26 delivery year is expected to be held in June 2024, after the Bid Date on March 12, 2024. The BRA for the 2025/26 delivery year, when held, will provide a visible capacity price for the last twelve months of the 24-month products. Bidders offering to supply the 24-month products are entirely responsible for any uncertainty related to the lack of visibility of the capacity price for those months.
  
  12/21/2023 in General
  
  

• FAQ-55:
  When will the Independent Evaluator notify RFP Bidders of winning Bids?
  
  The Independent Evaluator phones each RFP Bidder that has submitted Bids by 3 PM on the Bid Date and identifies the RFP Bidder’s Bids that are provided to the Commission as winning Bids. The Independent Evaluator also provides a notification to the RFP Bidder by email.
  
  12/21/2023 in General , Rules
  
  
• FAQ-54:
  Is a Default Supplier under DSP V that has winning Bids that are approved by the Commission in a subsequent solicitation under DSP V required to execute a new Uniform SMA and guaranty (if applicable)?
  
  No. PECO and each RFP Bidder with Bids that are approved by the Commission execute a single Uniform SMA and guaranty (if applicable) during the course of DSP V. A Default Supplier under DSP V that has winning Bids that are approved by the Commission in a subsequent solicitation under DSP V will execute one Transaction Confirmation for each product for which it has winning Bids and will not execute a new Uniform SMA or guaranty (if applicable).
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-53:
  Can you please provide a physical address for PECO for the purposes of issuing the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit?
  
  Please see the modification on page 5 of the list of acceptable modifications to the Pre-Bid Letter of Credit posted on the Supplier Documents page. If a physical address is required strictly for purposes of identifying the Beneficiary, it is acceptable to use PECO’s address below the beneficiary name. The pre-bid letter of credit must be submitted as an electronic PDF file via electronic means only to the Independent Evaluator. A hardcopy version should not be delivered to this address.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-52:
  Can you please provide the Planning Year 2024-2025 peak load contribution data for default service customers and for customers served by EGSs for each customer class?
  
  The Total Peak (MW) and Default Peak (MW) for each Class provided in the Addendum to the RFP Rules was updated on December 19, 2023 for Planning Year 2024-2025. Historical daily peak load contribution data for the total retail load, default service customers and for customers served by EGSs is available by Class and strata in the Data Room.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-51:
  Is the hourly load data in the Data Room already adjusted to include UFE? How does PECO allocate UFE?
  
  The hourly load data in the Data Room has already been adjusted to include Unaccounted for Energy (“UFE”).

  PECO allocates UFE to all Load Serving Entities in the PECO zone (i.e., to EGS and default service Load Serving Entities) each month based on load-ratio share. Prior to March 2015 UFE is allocated to monthly-metered customers and not to hourly/interval metered customers. Starting in March 2015 UFE is allocated to all customers, including hourly/interval metered customers.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-50:
  In Section 4 of the Standard Part 1 Form, an RFP Bidder that has not previously qualified pursuant to a successful Part 1 Proposal is required to provide a copy of the signature page of the Reliability Assurance Agreement (“RAA”). If the signature page is not available, can an RFP Bidder provide the current version of the RAA posted to PJM’s website including Schedule 17, which lists the parties to the RAA, to meet this requirement?
  
  If the RFP Bidder is a signatory to the Reliability Assurance Agreement (“RAA”) and the signature page is unavailable, the RFP Bidder may provide the current version of the RAA posted to PJM’s website including Schedule 17, which lists the parties to the RAA, to meet this requirement. For purposes of completing the Part 1 Proposal, the RFP Bidder must also provide a statement in Section 6 Justification of Omissions of the Part 1 Form explaining the signature page is not available.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-49:
  We are relying on a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor. What financial documentation should be provided in Section 2 in the online Part 1 Form?
  
  Financial information must be available for a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor. The RFP Bidder must submit the RFP Guarantor’s most recent quarterly financial information, including a balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement, and accompanying notes and schedules. If the SEC Form 10-Q is unavailable, the RFP Bidder must submit the RFP Guarantor’s most recently quarterly financial information accompanied by an attestation by the entity’s Chief Financial Officer (or similar position) that the information contained in the financial statements fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of the RFP Guarantor. The requirements for this attestation are provided more specifically in Appendix 5 of the RFP Rules. If this attestation is not available, the RFP Bidder must state so in the Justification of Omissions.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-48:
  Is it acceptable to provide a link to the financial information for the entity upon whose financial standing the RFP Bidder is relying?
  
  Quarterly financial information required in Section 2 of the online Part 1 Form must be submitted by upload to the online Part 1 Form or by email to the Independent Evaluator at PECOProcurement@nera.com. A link to the entity’s financial information on the entity’s website would not be acceptable.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-47:
  For an RFP Bidder relying on the financial standing of a Foreign Guarantor, when must the additional documents listed under Paragraph V.5.3 of the RFP Rules be submitted?
  
  With the Part 2 Proposal, an RFP Bidder that relies on the financial standing of a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor, must provide fully executed versions of the additional documents listed under Paragraph V.5.3 of the RFP Rules for the Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor to be granted unsecured credit and for the RFP Bidder to rely on the financial standing of the RFP Guarantor under the terms of the Uniform SMA.

  With the Part 1 Proposal, the RFP Bidder may, but is not required to, submit a draft of these documents. If an RFP Bidder submits a draft of the documents for evaluation, the Independent Evaluator will provide this evaluation to the RFP Bidder, including notice of any changes required to the documents, along with the Part 1 Notification. Any evaluation communicated to the RFP Bidder of such draft documents is final. The RFP Bidder cannot submit a subsequent request for changes on the basis of this evaluation.

  Please see Paragraphs IV.5.3 and V.5.3 of the RFP Rules for additional requirements applicable to RFP Bidders with Foreign Guarantors. The RFP Rules are available on the Supplier Documents page of the RFP website.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  

• FAQ-46:
  Should an RFP Bidder relying on the financial standing of a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor elect (b) in the Fifth Item of Section 1 for purposes of completing the online Part 1 Form?
  
  An RFP Bidder relying on the financial standing of a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor should elect (b) in the Fifth Item of Section 1 in the online Part 1 Form to indicate the RFP Bidder is relying on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor. Please complete items 1-3 with information regarding the Foreign Entity. If you need additional fields for completing the address for the Foreign Entity please use the space provided in Section 6. Justification of Omissions.
  
  12/21/2023 in General , Rules
  
  
• FAQ-45:
  If we use a digital signature to complete the Inserts, what additional document or information must be provided to verify the identity of the signatory? Can you provide an example?
  
  The Independent Evaluator accepts digital signatures. The Inserts may be completed by digitally signing the Insert and providing along with the completed Insert an additional document or information that verifies the identity of the signatory. Additional documentation or information may include: (i) a certificate of completion if the signatory uses DocuSign; (ii) a Final Audit Report if the signatory uses Adobe Sign; (iii) evidence that the digital signature has been certified by the signatory using a document signing Certificate if the signatory uses a digital signature created in Adobe Acrobat; or (iv) other documentation or information produced by a commercially available software that can be used by the Independent Evaluator to verify the identity of the signatory. The Independent Evaluator has posted a Digital Signatures Instructions document to the Supplier Documents page of the RFP Website.

  Please note that for purposes of completing an applicable Insert, a “digital” signature is one that is created using commercially available software (such as DocuSign, Adobe Acrobat, or Adobe Sign), which generates an additional document or information that can be used by the Independent Evaluator to verify the identity of the signatory. A digital signature is different from an “electronic” signature, which is computer-generated but is not created using a software that generates additional documentation or information that can be used to verify the identity of the signatory. An example of an electronic signature is an image of a signature.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  

• FAQ-44:
  Is a sample of the legal opinion of outside counsel required to qualify a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor available?
  
  A sample of the legal opinion of outside counsel required to qualify a Foreign Entity as RFP Guarantor is available upon request.
  
  12/21/2023 in General
  
  
• FAQ-43:
  Can I submit more than one Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit for review in a solicitation?
  
  An RFP Bidder can only submit one (1) Draft Pre-Bid Letter of Credit in a solicitation. For more information, please refer to Section VII.1.8. of the RFP Rules.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-42:
  Who can sign the Representative Insert (#P1-1)?
  
  The Representative Insert (#P1-1) must be signed by the individual who serves as the Officer of the RFP Bidder. The Officer of the RFP Bidder is an individual authorized to undertake contracts (including the Uniform SMA) and bind that RFP Bidder.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-41:
  Can an RFP Bidder rely on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor that does not file a SEC Form 10-Q/10-K? If so, what are the requirements?
  
  In order to rely on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor, discrete financial information must be available for the RFP Guarantor.

  An RFP Bidder must submit the RFP Guarantor’s most recent quarterly financial information, including a balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement, and any accompanying notes and schedules. If the SEC Form 10-Q/10-K is unavailable, the RFP Bidder must submit the RFP Guarantor’s most recent quarterly, monthly, or bi-annual financial information accompanied by an attestation by the entity’s Chief Financial Officer (or similar position) that the information contained in the financial statements fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of the operations of the entity. The requirements for this attestation are provided more specifically in Appendix 5 of the RFP Rules.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  

• FAQ-40:
  Has PECO implemented a time-of-use (“TOU”) rate option for residential and small commercial customers?
  
  PECO has implemented a TOU rate option for default service customers. Any residential customer who elects to go on TOU rate will be assigned to the residential default load. Any small commercial customer who opts to go on the TOU rate will be assigned to the small commercial default service load. See Tariff information for TOU rates for Procurement Class 1 (residential) and Procurement Class 2 (small commercial): https://www.peco.com/MyAccount/MyBillUsage/Pages/CurrentElectric.aspx
  
  12/21/2023 in General , Rates
  
  
• FAQ-39:
  Where can I find ICAP Weather Factors for each load profile?
  
  ICAP Weather Factors are available in the Data Room - Additional Data section of the RFP website.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-38:
  Can we submit cash or a surety bond instead of posting a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit with the Part 2 Proposal?
  
  No, neither cash nor surety bonds are an acceptable form of pre-bid security. With the Part 2 Proposal, an RFP Bidder must provide an executed Pre-Bid Letter of Credit. An RFP Bidder must either use the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit available on the RFP website, or a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit that incorporates only those modifications to the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit that have been approved by PECO and posted to the RFP website.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-37:
  Can a Default Supplier that does not own generation or use their generation to serve Default Load provide generation by fuel source data from the State of the Market Report for PJM to complete Appendix H?
  
  The inclusion of the new Appendix H in the SMA was approved by the PaPUC to enable PECO to provide better information in its annual report to the Commission on default service. Under the Commission’s regulations (52 Pa. Code section 54.39), PECO must report “the percentage of total electricity supplied by each energy source, including a detailed breakdown of renewable resources as defined in section 2803 of the code (relating to definitions).”

  PECO intends to aggregate supplier-provided information from Appendix H when compiling this data and will not attribute the generation delivered to any particular supplier or suppliers.

  PECO is not being prescriptive on how to complete Appendix H. If a supplier cannot determine the actual generation resource mix delivered to PECO under the SMA in a calendar year and chooses to use the PJM system mix for the calendar year as a proxy for their generation sources, we request that be notated on Appendix H when the completed form is submitted to PECO so that we may footnote which of our reported data is based on the PJM average mix and which is not.
  
  12/21/2023 in General
  
  

• FAQ-36:
  Will the Independent Evaluator retain a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit between solicitations if requested by an RFP Bidder?
  
  The Independent Evaluator will retain a Pre-Bid Letter of Credit between solicitations if requested by an RFP Bidder.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-35:
  What materials do I need to submit with my Part 2 Proposal if the officer who made the representations and certifications of the online Part 1 Form is unavailable to make the representations of the online Part 2 Form?
  
  If the Officer of the RFP Bidder who made the representations and certifications of the online Part 1 Form is unavailable to make the representations of the online Part 2 Form, the RFP Bidder must re-submit the certifications of the Part 1 Form naming a new individual to serve as Officer of the RFP Bidder by the Part 2 Date, and that Officer of the RFP Bidder must make all representations and certifications required by the online Part 1 Form and the online Part 2 Form. To confirm the list of required inserts, please contact the Independent Evaluator at pecoprocurement@nera.com.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-34:
  What are the line loss factors for calculating retail load from wholesale load?
  
  The loss percentages for each customer class are available in PECO’s Current Electric Generation Supplier Tariff (see 6.6 Line Losses on page 30) available here: Current Electric Rate Information | PECO - An Exelon Company.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-33:
  What is PECO’s two-step process to settle the hourly load obligations with each LSE and PJM?
  
  PECO settles hourly load obligations with each LSE and PJM via a two-step process:
  • Settlement A – PECO determines the estimated “day after” (delivery day) hourly load responsibility by recreating the load characteristics of the delivery day in question using a combination of available known, preliminary, and historically-based information. PECO then submits the load responsibility for all LSEs serving load on the settled day(s) to PJM in accordance with PJM procedural requirements and energy market schedules.
  • Settlement B – PECO determines the final hourly load responsibility approximately 60 days after an energy delivery month by reconciling actual individual customer meter readings and applicable load profile data with the Settlement A data for that month. PECO then calculates and submits the energy variances from Settlement A hourly scheduling for all LSEs to PJM in accordance with PJM procedural requirements and energy market schedules.

  PECO provides an overview of the determination of hourly load obligations on their website here: https://electricandgaschoice.force.com/s/article/Determination-of-Hourly-Load-Obligations-Overview
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-32:
  What is the price paid to the Default Supplier for a product in which the Default Supplier wins several tranches?
  
  Paragraph I.4.7 of the RFP Rules states, “A Default Supplier for a product will be paid a supplier-specific price for each MWh of electric load served as specified in the Transaction Confirmation for that product. The supplier-specific price for a Default Supplier for a product will be the average of approved Bids for that Default Supplier and for that product.”
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-31:
  What is the AEC Solar Penalty in the transaction confirmation and do Default Suppliers complete that information during the confirmation process?
  
  The AEC Solar Penalty is the alternative compliance payment as defined in the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act (“AEPS”).

  On the day the Commission approves some or all of the winning Bids, the Independent Evaluator sends to PECO the Uniform SMA, including all Exhibits, for each New Default Supplier. The Independent Evaluator will update the blank provided for the AEC Solar Penalty at that time.

  Please note that Default Suppliers are responsible for providing the AECs necessary for PECO to meet its obligations under the AEPS Act during the term of the Uniform SMA. The obligations of Default Suppliers in this regard are reduced by the AECs procured separately by PECO. In the Transaction Confirmation RFP Bidders must specify a price for each type of AECs (Tier I, Tier I Solar, and Tier II) that is included in the RFP Bidder’s winning Bids. As specified in the RFP Rules (see Paragraph V.1.2), each such price must be greater than $0/AEC. The RFP Bidder will be required to certify in its Part 2 Proposal that it will comply with this obligation.

  For more information on a DS Supplier’s obligations related to AEPS compliance, please see Appendix E of the Uniform SMA.
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  

• FAQ-30:
  In the hourly load data file, for the CCI-GS rate schedule, the Default Energy (MWh) is negative for hours 10-13 on 10/27/2017. Also, for those same hours, in the Unaccounted For Energy (UFE) file, the Total Zone UFE (MW) is positive. Please confirm that the data is correct.
  
  The values provided for the Default Energy (MWh) for the CCI-GS rate schedule and the Total Zone UFE in hours 10-13 on 10/27/2017 should be disregarded due to metering error.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-29:
  What was the timeline of the Medium Commercial Class transition from default service on a fixed-price basis to default service on an hourly-price basis?
  
  On June 1, 2016, PECO’s non-residential customers with a Peak Load Contribution between 100kW and 500kW, known as the Medium Commercial Class until May 31, 2017, transitioned from default service on a fixed-price basis to default service on an hourly-price basis with energy priced to the PJM day-ahead spot market. Starting June 1, 2017, these customers were merged with PECO’s Large Commercial & Industrial Class, non-residential customers with a Peak Load Contribution greater than 500kW, to form the Consolidated Commercial & Industrial Class (“CCI”). CCI customers will receive default service on an hourly-price basis with energy priced to the PJM day-ahead spot market.
  
  12/21/2023 in General
  
  
• FAQ-28:
  Are the Hourly PJM Deration Factors for the PECO Zone provided in Eastern Standard Time or Eastern Prevailing Time?
  
  Hourly reports align with Eastern Prevailing Time. For instance, Hour 1 pertains to the hour between 12:00 a.m. EPT and 1:00 a.m. EPT. Daylight Savings Time (DST) is treated as follows:
  • Hourly reports spanning the Fall DST period contain 25 consecutive hours.
  • Hourly reports spanning the Spring DST period contain 23 consecutive hours.

  For more information please see the Data Description document posted to the Data Room.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-27:
  Is a price on the Bid Form a price for a single tranche? Or does the price associated with the second tranche represent a price offered for two tranches?
  
  Each price on the Bid Form is for a single tranche. A “Bid” is a price in $/MWh for one tranche of a given product.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-26:
  Is the hourly load data posted in the Data Room for wholesale energy?
  
  As stated in the data description document, the hourly load data provided in the Data Room on the RFP website includes applicable distribution and transmission losses. These values will be de-rated by PJM for marginal losses prior to energy settlement. PECO provides hourly marginal loss deration factors in the Data Room.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-25:
  For the remaining Residential Default Load served by PECO, will PECO pay for all of the cost of full requirements service or only the cost of energy and AECs?
  
  In regards to the remaining Default Load, PECO will be a Load Serving Entity in PJM and will acquire all necessary supply through PJM-administered markets and will obtain sufficient Alternative Energy Credits (“AECs”) at market prices to satisfy any near-term obligations under the AEPS Act. Default Suppliers are not responsible for any of the costs related to the portion of the Default Load of the Residential Class served by PECO.
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-24:
  Where can I find a comprehensive list of historical default service rates for each customer class?
  
  PECO posts a Default Service rate calculation model that translates the prices determined through this RFP into Default Service rates or “Price to Compare” ("PTC") by customer class since 2017. These PTCs are available on the Company website here below the heading 'PTC Archive': https://www.peco.com/MyAccount/MyService/Pages/ElectricPricetoCompare.aspx
  
  12/21/2023 in Rates
  
  
• FAQ-23:
  Are the names of winning RFP Bidders publicly available?
  
  No, the names of winning RFP Bidders are not publicly available.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-22:
  When are the solicitation results announced?
  
  Within fifteen (15) days of the close of the solicitation, the Independent Evaluator releases the weighted average price as well as the percentage of load represented by each tranche for each product procured in that solicitation. When the results become available, the Independent Evaluator will make an announcement, and you will be able to access the results here: Background/Previous Results.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-21:
  On what volumes are the percentages listed for Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards (“AEPS”) compliance based?
  
  AEPS quantities are based on electric energy sold by an Electric Distribution Company (EDC) or Electric Generation Supplier (EGS) to retail electric customers. AEPS obligations are calculated based on the retail load, which is delivered energy at the retail meter and does not include marginal losses.
  
  12/21/2023 in General
  
  
• FAQ-20:
  In Exhibit 1, Transaction Confirmation, included in Appendix C of the Uniform SMA, there are blanks to provide the average costs for the Alternative Energy Credits (AECs). Will PECO provide these numbers to a winning bidder or are these numbers to be provided by the Seller?
  
  Default Suppliers are responsible for providing the AECs necessary for PECO to meet its obligations under the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (“AEPS”) Act during the term of the Uniform SMA. The obligations of Default Suppliers in this regard are reduced by the AECs procured separately by PECO. The blanks in the Transaction Confirmation are for the Default Supplier to provide a price for each type of AEC (Tier I, Tier I Solar, and Tier II) that is included in the RFP Bidder’s winning Bids. As specified in the RFP Rules (see Paragraph V.1.2), each such price must be greater than $0/AEC. The RFP Bidder will be required to certify in its Part 2 Proposal that it will comply with this obligation.
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-19:
  Who can sign the certifications required for the Part 1 Proposal?
  
  Please see Paragraph III.1.13 of the RFP Rules. For a given solicitation, all representations and certifications required by the RFP, including those required for the Part 1 Proposal and Part 2 Proposal, must be made by a single individual who serves as Officer of the RFP Bidder. An Officer of the RFP Bidder is an individual authorized to undertake contracts (including the Uniform SMA) and bind the RFP Bidder.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-18:
  Is it acceptable to rely on the financial standing of a Foreign Guarantor?
  
  Yes, RFP Bidders may rely on the financial standing of a Foreign Guarantor. Please see Paragraphs IV.5. and V.5. of the RFP Rules for additional requirements applicable to RFP Bidders with Foreign Guarantors. The RFP Rules are available on the Supplier Documents page of the RFP website.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-17:
  If the State of Pennsylvania increases the AEPS obligation, is the Default Supplier responsible for the incremental cost?
  
  Yes. Please see Appendix E of the Pennsylvania Default Service Supplier Master Agreement (“Uniform SMA”) which states, “If AEPS requirements change by law or any other reason, DS Supplier shall be responsible for providing the credits at its expense in order to comply with its obligations under Full Requirements Service.”
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-16:
  Are Default Suppliers responsible for providing any of the services or products included in full requirements service for the fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”)?
  
  No. Default Load for the Residential Class is reduced by a fractional percentage of committed energy and capacity obtained under contract with Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. for supply from the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”). Default Suppliers are not responsible for providing any of the services or products included in full requirements service for NYPA supply.
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-15:
  Is there a credit-based tranche cap in the PECO RFP?
  
  No, there is no cap on the number of tranches for which an RFP Bidder can bid on based on the credit assessment for the entity on which that RFP Bidder is relying. There are, however, load caps for a Class that are set so that the Default Service customers of that Class have no more than a 50% exposure to any one Default Supplier at any given time.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit , Rules
  
  
• FAQ-14:
  Is it required for the RFP Bidder to be registered to do business in the state of Pennsylvania?
  
  No, it is not a requirement under the Uniform SMA for suppliers to be registered to do business in the state of Pennsylvania. Please see Section 3.1 of the Pennsylvania Default Service Supplier Master Agreement (“Uniform SMA”) which states, the DS Supplier “is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other legal entity, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or, if another jurisdiction, under the laws of such jurisdiction and, in such case, is duly registered and authorized to do business in such other jurisdiction.”
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract , General
  
  
• FAQ-13:
  In the Uniform SMA Insert (#P1-4), an RFP Bidder is given the option to add subsection 5.4(a)(1). What calculation is used to calculate quantities if the RFP Bidder chooses to not add this subsection?
  
  If you opt for the notional quantity provision, under an event of default, future quantities are determined by looking at quantities from the previous calendar year and making any adjustments for DS Load changes (i.e., for current switching levels). In that manner, historical data is used and the quantities largely are pre-specified. The alternative is expected to use a forecast that would be made at the time of default; under such an option the quantities could not be pre-specified.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-12:
  Will DS Suppliers be responsible for Transmission Enhancement charges?
  
  PECO is the responsible party for Transmission Enhancement charges (ID #1108). Appendix D to the Uniform SMA provides the PJM Billing Statement line items, including transmission charges, and the responsible party (Buyer or Seller) for each item.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-11:
  Is there a cap on the number of tranches that an RFP Bidder can potentially bid?
  
  Yes, an RFP Bidder may have a Load Cap. The Independent Evaluator prepares a Bid Form for each RFP Bidder qualified pursuant to a successful Part 1 Proposal. If the RFP Bidder cannot bid on all tranches available of a product because of the Load Cap for the Class to which such product belongs and because of tranches previously won by the RFP Bidder, the Bid Form reflects that fact. Generally speaking, each Class has “Load Caps”, which are limits on the number of tranches of Default Supply that an RFP Bidder can bid and serve for that Class. The Load Caps ensure that there will be a diversified pool of Default Suppliers for each Class. The Load Caps for a Class are set so that the Default Service customers of that Class have no more than a 50% exposure to anyone Default Supplier at any given time. If two or more Default Suppliers are affiliated, the Load Caps will apply jointly to such group of Default Suppliers.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-10:
  We do not have an RFP Guarantor that meets the creditworthiness requirements under the Uniform SMA. Does this mean that we cannot participate in the RFP?
  
  An unrated entity or an entity with a credit rating below BBB- for S&P and/or Fitch or below Baa3 from Moody’s would not be granted any Unsecured Credit and cannot serve as an RFP Guarantor under the terms of the Uniform SMA (see Appendix A). It is not a requirement for an RFP Bidder to be rated or to rely on the financial standing of a Guarantor that meets the creditworthiness requirements in order to participate in the PECO RFP. In this case, the RFP Bidder would not be granted any Unsecured Credit and must post any required performance assurance collateral in the form of cash or a letter of credit.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-9:
  Does the hourly load data provided in the Data Room include transmission and distribution loss factors?
  
  The hourly load data provided in the Data Room includes both applicable distribution and transmission losses. These hourly load values will be de-rated by PJM for marginal losses prior to energy settlement. PECO provides hourly marginal loss deration factors in the Data Room. Please see Section 3.a.iii. Assumptions on page 10 of the data description document for assumptions and additional information related to the hourly energy data provided.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-8:
  Can you confirm that the hourly load data, and daily PLC and NSPL data in the Data Room has not already been adjusted for the NYPA allocation?
  
  The daily peak load contribution (“PLC”) and network transmission service peak load (“NSPL”) data for the Residential class are not adjusted for the NYPA allocation. Hourly load data for the Residential Class, which is broken down by load related to PECO’s default service customers (“Default Energy”) and load related to customers who have elected to be supplied by an Electric Generation Supplier (“EGS Energy”), is handled differently. In regards to the hourly load data for the Residential class, PECO subtracts the NYPA allocation from the Default Energy (MWh) column and adds a corresponding amount to the EGS Energy (MWh) column. For more information see the data description document posted to the Monthly data page in the Data Room.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  
• FAQ-7:
  Are Default Suppliers responsible for the AEPS Quarterly Adjustments?
  
  As fully described in Appendix E to the Uniform SMA, PECO provides Default Suppliers with an estimate of AEPS obligations following the second quarter of the AEPS reporting period with a final statement within thirty (30) calendar days of the end of the AEPS reporting period. Data on AEPS Quarterly Adjustments is available on the Pennsylvania Alternative Energy Credit Program website here: http://www.pennaeps.com/electricity-suppliers/

  As stated in Appendix E, “If AEPS requirements change by law or any other reason, DS Supplier shall be responsible for providing the credits at its expense in order to comply with its obligations under Full Requirements Service.” A Default Supplier that fails to provide sufficient AECs for a tranche will be required to pay any AEPS penalties, costs, charges, etc. assessed against the Default Supplier and/or the Company associated with the Default Supplier’s non-performance with AEPS requirements.
  
  12/21/2023 in Data
  
  

• FAQ-6:
  An RFP Bidder that is relying on the financial standing of an RFP Guarantor and is not a Default Supplier must provide a complete Guaranty Intent Insert (#P2-2) with the Part 2 Proposal. How do I calculate the Indicative Amount?
  
  The Indicative Amount must meet or exceed the sum of: (i) $600,000 times the number of tranches bid on products for the RES and SC Classes for full requirements on a fixed-price basis; and (ii) $300,000 times the number of tranches bid for the CCI Class for full requirements service on a spot-price basis (if applicable).
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-5:
  What is the settlement volume for which Default Suppliers are paid?
  
  Default Suppliers are responsible for and are paid based on a percentage of the Default Load for a Class. The applicable settlement volume includes distribution losses, transmission losses, unaccounted for energy (as reflected in PJM settlement volumes), and adjustments required by PJM for PJM’s derating in conjunction with implementation of marginal losses as appropriate per PJM Agreements. The hourly load data provided in the Data Room includes both applicable distribution and transmission losses, and has not been de-rated. PJM hourly de-ration factors and the hourly UFE values are available separately on the Data Room page on the RFP website. Please also see the Data Description Document, for information regarding how PECO allocates Unaccounted For Energy (“UFE”) to all Load Serving Entities (“LSEs”) in PECO’s zone.
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-4:
  When completing the Bid Form, if we do not want to submit a Bid for a tranche, do we leave the space provided blank or enter $0?
  
  When completing your Bid Form, Bids should be entered from top to bottom in Section 2 in the “Bids” tab of the Bid Form. Tranches for which no Bid is provided must be left blank. Please note that each price on the Bid Form is for a single tranche. A “Bid” is a price in $/MWh for one tranche of a given product.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  
• FAQ-3:
  Does a Bidder submit a single Pre-Bid Letter of Credit for all products on which it plans to bid?
  
  An RFP Bidder must, in its Part 2 Proposal, submit a single Pre-Bid Letter of Credit in an amount of at least: (i) $250,000 per tranche bid on products for the Residential and Small Commercial Classes; and (ii) $125,000 per tranche bid on a CCI product (if applicable). This Pre-Bid Letter of Credit must be in the form of the Standard Pre-Bid Letter of Credit or must incorporate only modifications that have been approved by PECO and posted to the RFP website.
  
  12/21/2023 in Credit
  
  
• FAQ-2:
  Is Buyer or Seller the responsible party for Network Integration Transmission Service (ID #1100)?
  
  PECO is the responsible party for Network Integration Transmission Service charges (ID #1100). Appendix D to the Uniform SMA provides the PJM Billing Statement line items, including transmission charges, and the responsible party (Buyer or Seller) for each item.
  
  12/21/2023 in Contract
  
  
• FAQ-1:
  On November 23, 2020, Act 114 of 2020 was signed into law. Are Default Suppliers responsible for providing alternative energy credits that are compliant with Act 114?
  
  Yes, Default Suppliers are responsible for providing the alternative energy credits necessary for PECO to meet its obligations under the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (“AEPS”) Act during the term of the Uniform SMA.
  
  12/21/2023 in Rules
  
  

www.nera.com

www.peco.com

Privacy Policy